This work considers the problem of resilient consensus where stochastic values of trust between agents are available. Specifically, we derive a unified mathematical framework to characterize convergence, deviation of the consensus from the true consensus value, and expected convergence rate, when there exists additional information of trust between agents. We show that under certain conditions on the stochastic trust values and consensus protocol: 1) almost sure convergence to a common limit value is possible even when malicious agents constitute more than half of the network connectivity, 2) the deviation of the converged limit, from the case where there is no attack, i.e., the true consensus value, can be bounded with probability that approaches 1 exponentially, and 3) correct classification of malicious and legitimate agents can be attained in finite time almost surely. Further, the expected convergence rate decays exponentially as a function of the quality of the trust observations between agents.

In this work, we introduce the Resilient Projected Push-Pull (RP3) algorithm designed for distributed optimization in multi-agent cyber-physical systems with directed communication graphs and the presence of malicious agents. Our algorithm leverages stochastic inter-agent trust values and gradient tracking to achieve geometric convergence rates in expectation even in adversarial environments. We introduce growing constraint sets to limit the impact of the malicious agents without compromising the geometric convergence rate of the algorithm. We prove that RP3 converges to the nominal optimal solution almost surely and in the $r$-th mean for any $r\geq 1$, provided the step sizes are sufficiently small and the constraint sets are appropriately chosen. We validate our approach with numerical studies on average consensus and multi-robot target tracking problems, demonstrating that RP3 effectively mitigates the impact of malicious agents and achieves the desired geometric convergence.

We consider a multi-agent system where agents aim to achieve a consensus despite interactions with malicious agents that communicate misleading information. Physical channels supporting communication in cyberphysical systems offer attractive opportunities to detect malicious agents, nevertheless, trustworthiness indications coming from the channel are subject to uncertainty and need to be treated with this in mind. We propose a resilient consensus protocol that incorporates trust observations from the channel and weighs them with a parameter that accounts for how confident an agent is regarding its understanding of the legitimacy of other agents in the network, with no need for the initial observation window $T_0$ that has been utilized in previous works. Analytical and numerical results show that (i) our protocol achieves a resilient consensus in the presence of malicious agents and (ii) the steady-state deviation from nominal consensus can be minimized by a suitable choice of the confidence parameter that depends on the statistics of trust observations.

The problem of single-agent Evasive AHT (EAHT), Active Hypothesis Testing (AHT) refers to the family of where a passive Eavesdropper (Eve) collects noisy estimates problems where one legitimate agent or decision maker, or a of the legit observations and tries to infer the underlying group of collaborating agents or decision makers, adaptively hypothesis, was studied in [24], focusing however explicitly select(s) sensing actions and collect(s) observations in order on the asymptotical case. In that work, the authors formulated to infer the underlying true hypothesis in a fast and reliable single-agent EAHT as a constrained optimization problem manner [1], [2]. AHT and related problems, such as active including the legitimate agent's and the Eavesdropper's (Eve) parameter estimation [3] and active change point detection [4], error exponent. However, near-optimal or optimal action selection [5], find numerous applications in wireless communications, policies were not presented. In this paper, motivated including anomaly detection over sensor networks [6], strong by the lack of explicit policies for EAHT, we present novel or weak radar models for target detection [7], cyber-intrusion single-and multi-agent EAHT approaches for wireless sensor detection, target search, and adaptive beamforming [8], as well networks that are based on a deep NeuroEvolution (NE) as, very recently, RIS-enabled localization [9] and channel framework. Our contributions are summarized as follows: estimation [10]. In addition, AHT is closely related to the 1) We formulate the single-agent EAHT problem studied feedback channel coding problem [11].

Enhancing resilience in distributed networks in the face of malicious agents is an important problem for which many key theoretical results and applications require further development and characterization. This work focuses on the problem of distributed optimization in multi-agent cyberphysical systems, where a legitimate agent's dynamic is influenced both by the values it receives from potentially malicious neighboring agents, and by its own self-serving target function. We develop a new algorithmic and analytical framework to achieve resilience for the class of problems where stochastic values of trust between agents exist and can be exploited. In this case we show that convergence to the true global optimal point can be recovered, both in mean and almost surely, even in the presence of malicious agents. Furthermore, we provide expected convergence rate guarantees in the form of upper bounds on the expected squared distance to the optimal value. Finally, we present numerical results that validate the analytical convergence guarantees we present in this paper even when the malicious agents compose the majority of agents in the network.

We address the problem of learning the legitimacy of other agents in a multiagent network when an unknown subset is comprised of malicious actors. We specifically derive results for the case of directed graphs and where stochastic side information, or observations of trust, is available. We refer to this as ``learning trust'' since agents must identify which neighbors in the network are reliable, and we derive a protocol to achieve this. We also provide analytical results showing that under this protocol i) agents can learn the legitimacy of all other agents almost surely, and that ii) the opinions of the agents converge in mean to the true legitimacy of all other agents in the network. Lastly, we provide numerical studies showing that our convergence results hold in practice for various network topologies and variations in the number of malicious agents in the network.